Plato and Aristotle Research Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Plato and Aristotle - Research Proposal ExampleThis practice is to this day referred to as Socratic dialogue and is much valued by pedagogues and counselors.Plato was, from the beginning interested with the relationship between what is ceaseless and immutable, and what is more transient and be givens in nature. This was a preoccupation of both Socrates as well as the pre-Socratic sophists, who were more concerned with kind morality and the societal ideals or virtues. While the sophists, like todays postmodernists held that ideas of right and wrong varied from state to state and were equally valid, this was not accepted by Socrates. He believed that there were absolute rules for right and wrong. He believed in eternal, immutable laws because human reason was eternal and immutable.Plato is concerned not only with what is eternal and immutable as regards morals (right and wrong) in society, but also what is eternal and immutable in nature. For Plato, there was no dichotomy as the two problems were the same. The reality he well-tried to grasp behind the appearances was what was eternally, true, beautiful and good.Before Plato arrived on the scene, Empedocles and Democritus had drawn attention to the fact that, although in nature everything appears to be transient, there must be something underlying this flow that never changes. Plato agreed with the view that everything flows and that there are no substances that time cannot dissolve and erode, but that what is permanent is in the idea of a timeless form which is eternal and immutable. So, for Plato, what was immutable was not anything physical and demonstrable, but a conception of a spiritual and abstract pattern that underpin all tangible things in the world. For example, while individual, physical provides may differ in several dimensions, there is an unchanging model of what a horse is or should be and each individual horse conforms to it. Plato decided that there were a limited number of forms giving ris e to all the varied forms we experience around us. Plato called these forms ideas. Plato concluded that there was a great reality behind the observable, material world and that this reality resolved itself into the world of ideas. These are the eternal and immutable patterns behind all observable phenomena and were the basis for Platos possible action of ideas. Plato observed that nothing that is perceived by the senses could last forever. Plato therefore, expounded the view that we could not wee-wee true knowledge of things that are in a constant desegregate and are changing. We can have true knowledge of things that are understood by the use of our faculty for reasoning while we can only have opinions about what we perceive through our senses. He illustrated his belief that all natural phenomena are merely shadows of their true forms and ideas by utilizing the myth of the cave. He likened normal people to those nutrition in an underground cave sitting with their backs to the mouth of the cave and unable to move or look around. Meanwhile there are shadows of human-like creatures projected on a wall, and to the cave dwellers that is the only observed reality for them. They cannot know what is behind these shadows. If however, one of the cave dwellers were to free him/herself and see the actual figures who cast the shadows,