Discussion on Modes of Arguments Research Paper

Discussion on Modes of Arguments - Research Paper instanceHe seems to be of the opinion that Native Americans deserve the positions and the American economy would survive and even change without immigrants. But when we read the root further, it seems something different from where it was started. He seems to argue over the moo wage browse in his writing. He argued that since the Americans after graduating do non indulge themselves in learning technical skills, they atomic number 18 non able to contribute to the technical fields. They are also not able to earn superior for that very reason. The argument seems too vaguely discussed that one may relate his assertions to Americas incapableness of taking on management and technical roles. Does the author argue on having immigrants at higher aim managerial roles then? Certainly not The author seems to support Americas capability of providing low skilled labor insufficient supply to collect the demands. The argument posed a bit negative and was not formulated carefully. Chiswick supports his claim for the eradication of immigrants by referring to students, housewives and the retired population of America, who would gladly take on the roles requiring low-skills to meet their needs. The author intentionally pointed towards housewives and students to rise up an emotional appeal for the rights and needs of these weak, sensitive and patently myrmecophilous groups. This is an excellent example of a pathos element of writing used in the content on a lower floor discussion. He further states that there is a concentration of low-skilled workers in America due to legal and guilty immigration. The supply of low-skilled labor is more than its demand which results in lowering of the wage rates. He used the subject field of a farmer to evidence the needlessness of immigrants. He uses the logos element by reasoning that utilise machines and the latest technologies, the costs can be reduced and efficiency improved in almost every field. The unornamentedly logical and practical reason, however, seems flawed as the machinery, latest technologies and its use require much more chief city investment that could be afforded by farmers, small-scale businesses and sole- proprietors etc. In the last paragraph, the author seems to persuade the American nation by putting forward emotional arguments. He uses ethos to some extent by using proper tone, developing a sense of unity and motivating the Americans by identifying their strengths. In my opinion, the author has not developed a sound case. This writing starts from one direction and ends on another making the topic and discussion confusing. The writer is not able to maintain harmony throughout his writing. The absurdity of his reasoning is apparent in the last few paragraphs where he offers the reduction in changing of sheets and towels. The American economy does not need low-skilled workers for changing sheets and towels only. Reducing consumption or changing patterns would not only reduce the property of services provided by hotels, restaurants and other businesses but would also threaten the existence of many businesses.